You are looking at historical revision 1624 of this page. It may differ significantly from its current revision.
;;; Chicken Invaders bm2005-sep-03 ;;; Catch the eggs in your basket ;;; usage: csi invader.scm ;;; ;;; I am trying to understand continuations.. but still not sure! ;;; Author: firstname.lastname@example.org License: GPL (require 'ncurses ) (define STARTX 5) (define STARTY 3) (define ENDX 25) (define ENDY 14) (define ROW-BASKET 15) (define *ypos* (+ STARTY 2)) (define *xpos* STARTX) (define CHICK1 15) (define *done* 0) (define *last-key* 0) ;;; main loop of the game:- ;;; cc-play -> cc-drop-eggs -> cc-basket-steps -> cc-play ;;; called from main once, otherwise called from cc-basket-steps (define (cc-play do-other-stuff) (refresh) (update-key) (call/cc cc-drop-eggs)) (define (cc-drop-eggs do-other-stuff) (mvaddstr (- *ypos* 1) CHICK1 " ") (mvaddstr *ypos* CHICK1 " 0 ") (mvaddstr (+ *ypos* 1) CHICK1 " ") (set! *ypos* (move-egg *ypos*)) (call/cc cc-basket-steps)) ;;; update the egg-catching basket ;;; the loop here apparently gets aborted and restarted after call/cc (define (cc-basket-steps do-other-stuff) (let loop () (when ( = *last-key* KEY_RIGHT) ( set! *last-key* 0) ( set! *xpos* ( + *xpos* 1)) ( set! *xpos* ( min *xpos* ENDX)) ) (when ( = *last-key* KEY_LEFT) ( set! *last-key* 0) ( set! *xpos* ( - *xpos* 1)) ( set! *xpos* ( max *xpos* STARTX)) ) (mvaddstr ROW-BASKET *xpos* " \\__/ ") (call/cc cc-play ) (loop))) ;;;; look for F1, left-arrow, right-arrow (define ( update-key ) (set! *last-key* ( char->integer (getch))) (when (= *last-key* (KEY_F 1) ) (endwin) ; press F1 to exit (exit))) ;;; update egg dropping, keep in bounds (define (move-egg y) (if ( > y ENDY ) STARTY (+ y 1 ))) ;;; initialize ncurses, start running ;;; (define (main) (initscr) (cbreak) (raw) (noecho) (keypad (stdscr) #t) (halfdelay 1) (curs_set 0) (set! *last-key* KEY_RIGHT) (mvaddstr ROW-BASKET *xpos* " \\__/ ") (mvaddstr 1 15 "(_)> (_)>") (refresh) (cc-play 0) (endwin) ) (main) (exit)
What use are the call/cc statements in this program? It should work exactly the same (or even better, because of less wasted resources) if they were just replaced by normal calls. -- murphy